Article 4 Modification de la composition de l’équipe d’examen conjoint

Summary What does Article 4 of the RTS on joint examination teams say?

This article establishes a performance review mechanism for members of the joint examination team.

It builds directly on Article 2, which defines the material changes that can trigger a reassessment of the team's composition.

Here, those same triggers — alongside periodic reviews and a change in Lead Overseer — activate a formal assessment of team members' results, which then informs decisions about whether the team's membership should be changed.

Important points:

The Lead Overseer is required to consult joint examination team members before assessing their results.
Both the Lead Overseer and the nominating authorities must use the assessment results to decide whether membership changes are appropriate.
The review is triggered periodically, upon a change in Lead Overseer, or when material changes as defined in Article 2(2) occur.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

Périodiquement, ou en cas de changement du superviseur principal, ou en cas de changements significatifs tels que visés à l’article 2, paragraphe 2, le superviseur principal, après avoir consulté les membres de l’équipe d’examen conjoint, évalue leurs résultats. Les autorités de désignation et le superviseur principal utilisent les résultats de cette évaluation pour décider s’il y a lieu de modifier la composition de l’équipe d’examen conjoint.

Table of contents

Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.