Source: OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, pp. 1–66Consolidated text

Current language: FR

Article 45 Contrôle de la Cour de justice


Summary What does Article 45 of the DMA regulation say?

This brief but significant article establishes the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in reviewing financial penalties imposed by the Commission under this Regulation.

It draws directly on Article 261 TFEU to grant the Court unlimited jurisdiction over such decisions, meaning the Court is not merely checking whether the Commission acted lawfully, but can actively intervene on the substance of the penalty itself.

Important points:

  • The Court of Justice has unlimited jurisdiction to review Commission decisions imposing fines or periodic penalty payments.
  • The Court may cancel, reduce, or increase any fine or periodic penalty payment imposed by the Commission.
  • This article connects to Articles 30 and 31, which govern the Commission's power to impose those fines and periodic penalty payments in the first place.

Springlex's summary of the article is a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

Conformément à l’article 261 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne, la Cour de justice statue avec compétence de pleine juridiction sur les recours dirigés contre les décisions par lesquelles la Commission inflige des amendes ou des astreintes. Elle peut supprimer, réduire ou majorer l’amende ou l’astreinte infligée.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod