Source: OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024

Current language: FR

Article 93 Pouvoir de demander des mesures


Summary What does Article 93 of the AI act regulation say?

This article sets out the corrective powers available to the Commission when dealing with providers of general-purpose AI models.

It flows directly from Article 92, which covers the evaluation process — Article 93 is essentially what happens next if that evaluation reveals problems.

The Commission can require providers to come into compliance, implement risk mitigation measures, or in the most serious cases, restrict, withdraw, or recall the model from the market entirely.

Notably, the process includes a structured dialogue step that the AI Office may initiate before any formal measure is requested, and where a provider voluntarily offers commitments during that dialogue, the Commission has the power to make those commitments legally binding and close the matter.

Important points:

  • The Commission has the power to require providers of general-purpose AI models to take compliance measures, implement mitigations, or withdraw their model from the market.
  • The AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with a provider before any formal corrective measure is issued.
  • If a provider offers commitments to address a systemic risk during that dialogue, the Commission can make those commitments binding and declare no further action is needed.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Lorsque cela est nécessaire et approprié, la Commission peut demander aux fournisseurs:

      1. de prendre les mesures appropriées pour se conformer aux obligations énoncées à aux articles 53 et 54;

      2. de mettre en œuvre des mesures d’atténuation, lorsque l’évaluation effectuée conformément à l’article 92 a suscité des préoccupations sérieuses et fondées quant à un risque systémique au niveau de l’Union;

      3. de restreindre la mise à disposition du modèle sur le marché, de le retirer ou de le rappeler.

    1. Avant qu’une mesure ne soit demandée, le Bureau de l’IA peut entamer un dialogue structuré avec le fournisseur du modèle d’IA à usage général.

    1. Si, au cours du dialogue structuré visé au paragraphe 2, le fournisseur du modèle d’IA à usage général présentant un risque systémique s’engage à mettre en œuvre des mesures d’atténuation pour faire face à un risque systémique au niveau de l’Union, la Commission peut, par une décision, rendre ces engagements contraignants et déclarer qu’il n’y a plus lieu d’agir.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod