Source: OJ L, 2025/299, 13.2.2025

Current language: EN

Preamble Recitals


Recital 1Complementary to DORA's requirements

Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector and amending Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009, (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 600/2014, (EU) No 909/2014 and (EU) 2016/1011 (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2554/oj). provide for requirements relating to response and recovery, backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methods concerning the ICT systems of financial entities, including crypto-asset services providers. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774(3)Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774 of 13 March 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying ICT risk management tools, methods, processes, and policies and the simplified ICT risk management framework (OJ L, 2024/1774, 25.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/1774/oj). further specifies components of the ICT business continuity policy, the testing of ICT business continuity plans, the components of the ICT response and recovery plans of financial entities, including crypto-asset service providers. This Regulation complements those provisions of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 and of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774 with respect to continuity and regularity in the performance of the crypto-asset services.

Recital 2Communicating permissionless distributed ledger disruptions

In providing their services, crypto-asset service providers may use a distributed ledger over which they have no control, including a permissionless distributed ledger. In that case, they may not be capable of ensuring the regularity and continuity of their services when disruptions are caused by problems that are inherent to the operation of such distributed ledgers. To mitigate market volatility that may have an adverse impact on clients affected by such disruptions, crypto-asset service providers should include in their business continuity policy measures for timely communication with clients and other external stakeholders. Such communication should include essential and timely information for clients on such disruptions, including ongoing status updates, until the disruption is resolved and services are resumed. Where information on the status of the permissionless distributed ledger responsible for a service disruption is not readily available to the crypto-asset service provider, that crypto-asset service provider should communicate updates to clients and other stakeholders, including competent authorities, on a best effort basis to ensure that clients and stakeholders have as comprehensive information as possible on such disruptions.

Recital 3Proportionality principle and self-assessment

To avoid disproportionate administrative burden for small and medium-enterprises and start-ups, crypto-asset service providers should consider in their business continuity policy the scale, nature, and range of the services they provide. That means that crypto-asset service providers should determine their specific business continuity requirements on the basis of a robust self-assessment, based on a number of criteria that would enable them to implement a business continuity policy that is commensurate with the market impact of their services. The self-assessment should also take into account other circumstances beyond those listed in the Annex that may have an impact on the crypto-asset service provider.

Recital 4Based on ESMA draft

This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted to the Commission by the European Securities and Markets Authority.

Recital 5Open public consultations

The European Securities and Markets Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the advice of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council(4)Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1095/oj).,

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod