Source: OJ L 277, 27/10/2022, p. 1–102

Current language: EN

Article 8 No general monitoring or active fact-finding obligations


Summary What does Article 8 of the DSA regulation say?

This is a notably brief but important protective article that establishes a foundational limitation on what can be required of intermediary service providers.

It directly complements the conditional liability exemptions set out in Articles 4, 5, and 6 by making clear that those exemptions cannot be undermined by imposing blanket surveillance obligations.

In short, providers cannot be forced to proactively police their own networks or storage for illegal activity.

Important points:

  • Intermediary service providers are not required to monitor the information they transmit or store on a general basis.
  • Intermediary service providers are not required to actively seek out facts or circumstances that might indicate illegal activity.
  • This article acts as a safeguard against general monitoring mandates, reinforcing the conditional liability framework established elsewhere in the regulation.

Springlex's summary of the article is a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

No general obligation to monitor the information which providers of intermediary services transmit or store, nor actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity shall be imposed on those providers.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod