Source: OJ L 277, 27/10/2022, p. 1–102

Current language: EN

Article 71 Commitments


Summary What does Article 71 of the DSA regulation say?

This article sits within the Commission's enforcement toolkit against very large online platforms and very large online search engines, operating alongside the formal non-compliance decision process under Article 73.

It establishes a commitments mechanism, whereby if a provider offers undertakings during ongoing proceedings, the Commission can formalise those commitments as legally binding and close the case.

However, the Commission retains the power to reopen proceedings under certain circumstances, and can outright reject commitments it considers insufficient.

Important points:

  • The Commission may accept commitments from providers of very large online platforms or very large online search engines and make them legally binding, closing the proceedings with no further grounds for action.
  • The Commission can reopen proceedings if facts materially change, the provider acts contrary to its commitments, or the original decision was based on incorrect or misleading information.
  • The Commission must reject commitments through a reasoned decision where it considers those commitments unable to ensure effective compliance with the Regulation.

Springlex's summary of the article is a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. If, during proceedings under this Section, the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned offers commitments to ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, the Commission may by decision make those commitments binding on the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned and declare that there are no further grounds for action.

    1. The Commission may, upon request or on its own initiative, reopen the proceedings:

      1. where there has been a material change in any of the facts on which the decision was based;

      2. where the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned acts contrary to its commitments; or

      3. where the decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information provided by the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned or other person referred to in Article 67(1).

    1. Where the Commission considers that the commitments offered by the provider of the very large online platform or of the very large online search engine concerned are unable to ensure effective compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, it shall reject those commitments in a reasoned decision when concluding the proceedings.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod