Source: OJ L 265, 12.10.2022, pp. 1–66Consolidated text

Current language: EN

Article 31 Periodic penalty payments


Summary What does Article 31 of the DMA regulation say?

This article establishes the Commission's power to impose recurring daily financial penalties — known as periodic penalty payments — on undertakings and associations of undertakings to compel compliance.

Rather than being a standalone punishment, this tool works in tandem with other articles in the regulation, acting as an enforcement mechanism to back up decisions already issued under them, such as those relating to compliance specifications, interim measures, commitments, and non-compliance findings.

The article also provides that once compliance is achieved, the Commission has discretion to reduce the final amount owed below what the original decision would have produced.

Important points:

  • The Commission may impose periodic penalty payments of up to 5% of average daily worldwide turnover per day on undertakings, including gatekeepers, that fail to comply with a range of Commission decisions.
  • These payments are a compulsive tool, not a punitive fine — they are designed to force compliance and are tied to decisions issued under multiple other articles of the regulation.
  • The Commission may set the definitive amount of the penalty at a lower figure than originally imposed if the undertaking satisfies the obligation it was intended to enforce.

Springlex's summary of the article is a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. The Commission may adopt a decision imposing on undertakings, including gatekeepers where applicable, and associations of undertakings periodic penalty payments not exceeding 5 % of the average daily worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year per day, calculated from the date set by that decision, in order to compel them:

      1. to comply with the measures specified by the Commission in a decision adopted pursuant to Article 8(2);

      2. to comply with the decision pursuant to Article 18(1);

      3. to supply correct and complete information within the time limit required by a request for information made by decision pursuant to Article 21;

      4. to ensure access to data, algorithms and information about testing in response to a request made pursuant to Article 21(3) and to supply explanations on those as required by a decision pursuant to Article 21;

      5. to submit to an inspection which was ordered by a decision taken pursuant to Article 23;

      6. to comply with a decision ordering interim measures taken pursuant to Article 24;

      7. to comply with commitments made legally binding by a decision pursuant to Article 25(1);

      8. to comply with a decision pursuant to Article 29(1).

    1. Where the undertakings, or associations of undertakings, have satisfied the obligation which the periodic penalty payment was intended to enforce, the Commission may adopt an implementing act, setting the definitive amount of the periodic penalty payment at a figure lower than that which would arise under the original decision. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 50(2).

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod