Source: OJ L, 2024/1640, 19.6.2024

Current language: DE

Artikel 35 Wirkung strafrechtlicher Bestimmungen


Summary What does Article 35 of the Sixth anti-money laundering (AML 6) directive say?

This brief but important article acts as a safeguard to the inter-FIU cooperation framework established in the preceding articles (31–34).

It ensures that technical legal differences between Member States — specifically how they each define predicate offences in national law — cannot be used as a justification to block or restrict the exchange, dissemination, or use of information between FIUs.

Important points:

  • Diverging national definitions of predicate offences must not obstruct FIUs from providing assistance to one another.
  • The information flows established under Articles 31, 32, 33, and 34 are explicitly protected from being limited on this basis.
  • FIUs are required to maintain cooperation regardless of definitional inconsistencies across Member State legal systems.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

Unterschiedliche Definitionen von Vortaten im jeweiligen nationalen Recht dürfen dem nicht entgegenstehen, dass die zentralen Meldestellen einer anderen zentralen Meldestelle Amtshilfe leisten, und sie dürfen auch nicht zu Einschränkungen des Austauschs, der Weitergabe und der Verwendung von Informationen gemäß den Artikeln 31, 32, 33 und 34 führen.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod